EPA Backs 7 Plant Pesticides
APO 27.09.97 16:25
Copyright 1997 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
The information contained in this news report may not be
published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior
written authority of the Associated Press.
By CURT ANDERSON
AP Farm Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a quiet revolution, the use of genetic
science in agriculture has now reached the point where farmers
are planting crops that contain the material needed to kill many
pests -- all without spraying chemicals.
Foremost among these new varieties are plants with the ability to
produce toxins because they contain genes from a common soil
bacteria known as B.t. There are numerous kinds of B.t. --
shorthand for Bacillus thurigiensis -- each with the ability to
destroy specific kinds of insects.
The Environmental Protection Agency has so far approved seven
such plant-pesticides for corn, cotton and potatoes. This year's
B.t. corn crop is estimated at about 3 million acres, and
dramatically improved yields are projected.
B.t. is an important weapon in the battle by corn farmers against
the European corn borer. For cotton farmers, it can help control
boll weevils, while potato growers gain protection again Colorado
potato beetles.
"It's going to be extremely important to our ability to meet
the food demands of the future in environmentally sound
ways," said Chuck Johnson, chief of Pioneer Hi-Bred
International Inc., the world's largest seed company.
But organic farmers and environmental groups, including
Greenpeace and the Sierra Club, say there's a hidden danger:
insects may become resistant to B.t. more quickly because of
constant high-dose exposure to the plants, destroying B.t.'s
effectiveness as a conventional insecticide forever.
Organic farmers say the B.t. sprays, which have been in use for
36 years, are the only effective natural alternative to synthetic
pesticides.
"Should we ever lose B.t., our ability as organic farmers to
grow quality produce will be in serious question," said Jim
Gerritsen, an organic potato farmer from Bridgewater, Maine.
The groups this month filed a petition with the EPA demanding
that all B.t. plant-pesticide registrations be canceled and that
the agency conduct a thorough study of the impact of allowing
such crops. The issue could wind up in federal court.
EPA spokesman Al Heier said the agency regards the petition as a
serious one, but he noted that the agency consulted outside
panels of scientific experts on the issue of insect resistance
before issuing the B.t. registrations.
"Resistance management was the main issue we wrestled
with," Heier said.
The key, according to EPA, is that farmers who grow B.t. crops
must set aside nearby areas with untreated plants.
On these acres, known as "refugia," the insect pests
could grow and reproduce without being exposed to the pesticide
plants. Their offspring, the theory goes, would remain sensitive
to B.t. -- and when they mate with any insects that have gained
resistance to B.t., the little bugs those unions produce would
still be sensitive to B.t.
"We feel that's as good a program as you can have,"
Heier said.
The agriculture industry insists it can manage the resistance
issue effectively using these methods. The National Cotton
Council, for instance, found in a 1998 survey of B.t. growers
that 98 percent of them properly set aside the
"refugia" acreage.
In addition, cotton growers in Alabama were able to protect their
crop last year using the fewest pounds of pesticides in 50 years,
said Frank Carter, pest management manager for the Cotton
Council.
"B.t. cotton is one of the most environmentally friendly and
economically advantageous crop protection tools ever made
available to cotton growers," Carter said.
Still, Pioneer's Johnson acknowledged that the insect resistance
concern is a real one that demands close scrutiny as B.t. crops
are increasingly used by American farmers.
"We are on the front end of really understanding how to use
these things," Johnson said. "We have to be diligent in
how we test and evaluate those products so we don't make
mistakes."